Maths encyclopedia and lessons  
Search

Mathematics Encyclopedia and Lessons

 
     
 

Lessons

Popular
Subjects

algebra
arithmetic
calculus
equations
geometry
differential equations
trigonometry
number theory
probability theory
more
 

References

applied mathematics
mathematical games
mathematicians
more
 
 

Carathéodory's theorem (convex hull)


In mathematics Carathéodory's theorem on convex sets states that if a point x of Rd lies in the convex hull of a set P, there is a subset P′ of P consisting of no more than d+1 points such that x lies in the convex hull of P′. In other words, x lies in a d-simplex with vertices in P. The result is named for Constantin Carathéodory.

For example, consider a set P={(0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1)} which is a subset of R2. The convex hull of this set is a square. Consider now a point x=(1/4, 1/4), which is in the convex hull of P. We can then construct a set {(0,0),(0,1),(1,0)} = P′, the convex hull of which is a triangle and encloses p, and thus the theorem works for this instance, since |P′| = 3. It may help to visualise Carathéodory's theorem in 2 dimensions, as saying that we can construct a triangle consisting of points from P that encloses any point in P.

Proof

Let x be a point in the convex hull of P. Then, x is a convex combination of points in P:

\mathbf{x}=\sum_{j=1}^k \lambda_j \mathbf{x}_j

where every xj is in P, every λj is nonnegative, and \sum_{j=1}^k\lambda_j=1.

Suppose k>d+1 (otherwise, there is nothing to prove). Then, the points x2-x1, ..., xk-x1 are linearly dependent, so there are real scalars μ2, ..., μk, not all zero, such that

\sum_{j=2}^k \mu_j (\mathbf{x}_j-\mathbf{x}_1)=\mathbf{0}.

If μ1 is defined as

\mu_1:=-\sum_{j=2}^k \mu_j

then

\sum_{j=1}^k \mu_j \mathbf{x}_j=\mathbf{0}
\sum_{j=1}^k \mu_j=0

and not all of the μj are equal to zero. Therefore, at least one μj>0. Then,

\mathbf{x} = \sum_{j=1}^k \lambda_j \mathbf{x}_j-\alpha\sum_{j=1}^k \mu_j \mathbf{x}_j = \sum_{j=1}^k (\lambda_j-\alpha\mu_j) \mathbf{x}_j

for any real α. In particular, the equality will hold if α is defined as

\alpha:=\min_{1\leq j \leq k} \left\{ \frac{\lambda_j}{\mu_j}:\mu_j>0\right\}=\frac{\lambda_i}{\mu_i}.

Note that α>0, and for every j between 1 and k,

\lambda_j-\alpha\mu_j \geq 0.

In particular, λi-αμi=0 by definition of α. Therefore,

\mathbf{x} = \sum_{j=1}^k (\lambda_j-\alpha\mu_j) \mathbf{x}_j

where every λj-αμj is nonnegative, their sum is one , and furthermore, λi - αμi = 0. In other words, x is represented as a convex combination of at most k-1 points of P. This process can be repeated until x is represented as a convex combination of at most d+1 points in P.

Q.E.D.

External links

01-04-2007 01:18:14
The contents of this article are licensed from Wikipedia.org
under the GNU Free Documentation License. How to see transparent copy